Windsurf
Windsurf now redirects to Devin: windsurf.com lands on devin.ai and the docs on docs.devin.ai/desktop, and the product is called Devin Desktop, with Devin Local as its agent.
- AI code editor
- MCP
Free tier + paid
Cloud / background agent
Coding agent from Cognition. Runs on: Web. Supports MCP servers.
Checked 2026-10-31
Loading poll...
Devin is Cognition's cloud-based AI software engineer. You give it a ticket or a request in the web app, Slack, Microsoft Teams, Linear or Jira, and it works in its own virtual machine with an IDE, shell and browser, then returns a pull request. Plans are Free, Pro $20 a month, Max $200 and Teams. Checked 31 October 2026.
Devin | |
|---|---|
Maker | Cognition |
What it is | A cloud agent that works through tickets and returns PRs; also a CLI and a desktop IDE |
Where you use it | Web app (app.devin.ai), Slack and Microsoft Teams, Devin CLI, API, Devin Desktop |
Plans | Free $0, Pro $20 a month, Max $200 a month, Teams $80 plus $40 per full seat, Enterprise custom |
Security | SOC 2 Type II since September 2024, per Cognition |
Data default | Cognition may train on your data; paid plans can opt out |
Related | Devin Desktop, the former Windsurf |
License | Proprietary |
The docs describe Devin as "the AI software engineer, built to help ambitious engineering teams crush their backlogs." The mental model is a junior engineer on a remote machine. You hand it a task. It opens an environment with an embedded IDE, shell and browser, which you can watch or take over. It writes, runs and tests code, then reports back.
That differs from an editor assistant. In Cursor or GitHub Copilot you sit with the agent. With Devin you can walk away. The cost of that independence is review: you read the result as a pull request, not as a live session.
/handoff.The docs list the strengths:
And the advice on prompts: give clear instructions with explicit completion criteria, pick tasks that are easy to verify (for example, CI passes), and split complex work into well-scoped steps with context or examples. The docs offer a rule of thumb: if a task takes you about three hours, Devin can likely do it. They also say it handles most tasks but not "extremely difficult" ones, and that it may not always behave as documented.
A good ticket for any cloud agent has four parts:
That structure helps with Claude Code and Codex cloud work as well.
curl -fsSL https://cli.devin.ai/install.sh | bash # macOS, Linux, WSL
brew install --cask devin-cli # macOS
cd your-project
devinOr sign up at app.devin.ai. If your company already works with Cognition, ask your administrator for access. The CLI can create, steer and resume cloud sessions, open an SSH shell on a session's VM and forward ports. Its docs state it does not yet support Knowledge, Playbooks or Secrets from your Devin account.
From devin.ai/pricing and the billing docs on 31 October 2026:
Plan | Price | Notes |
|---|---|---|
Free | $0 | One member, limited Devin usage, Devin Review and DeepWiki |
Pro | $20 a month | One member, daily and weekly quota, pay-as-you-go on-demand credits; covers cloud sessions, CLI and Desktop; Slack, Linear and MCP |
Max | $200 a month | One member, larger weekly quota, no daily cap |
Teams | $80 a month minimum | Up to 200 members; full seat $40 a month with Desktop access; flex seat free without Desktop, drawing on a shared credit pool |
Enterprise | Custom | SSO via SAML or OIDC, admin controls, dedicated deployment option, dedicated account management |
The pages do not give quota sizes or the older Agent Compute Unit figures. Extra usage on Pro is billed at API pricing. The exact cost of a task therefore depends on its size and the model, and the pricing FAQ says cost per message varies by model, task size and reasoning needed.
If you plan to run many tasks a day, expect to land on Max or Teams. Compare cloud-agent cost with Cursor's Premium tier at $30 and the $200 tiers elsewhere in AI coding agent pricing compared.
Three statements from Cognition's security page:
The practical rule: on Free, assume your prompts and code may be used for training. Opt out on a paid plan if that matters, and check the opt-out is set before you connect a private repository. For regulated work, ask about the Enterprise deployment options.
Alternative | Difference |
|---|---|
MIT-licensed, self-hosted control center that can drive several agents | |
Cursor Cloud Agents | Inside an editor product; needs Premium or above |
Cloud agent attached to github.com issues and PRs | |
Web sessions and CI use; Claude models only | |
A different agent product worth a look | |
Spec-first IDE and CLI |
Read the full set in AI coding agents and Cursor alternatives.
Devin is aimed at teams with a backlog of well-defined work: migrations, test coverage, dependency upgrades, small tickets. It is less suited to exploratory design work where you want to think alongside the agent, and to people who want to watch every edit. A solo developer will probably get more from an editor or terminal agent at lower cost. A team lead who wants to clear fifty small tickets will find the cloud model closer to the need.
Here is the difference between a ticket that works and one that does not.
Weak: "Fix the login bug."
Better:
Users who sign in with an email containing a plus sign get "invalid email".
Reproduce with test+one@example.com on the /login page.
The validation lives in src/auth/validate.ts.
Done when: a new unit test covers plus-addressed emails, all existing tests pass in CI,
and the change touches only src/auth.
Do not change the signup flow.The second version states the symptom, the repro, the file, a finish line and a boundary. It also makes the result easy to review, because you only need to check the new test and the diff size. The docs' advice to pick tasks that are easy to verify is the same idea.
A cloud agent changes who does what, so decide the rules before the first task.
For code review help of your own, see AI code review and the code review subagent.
If you are evaluating for a company, ask Cognition for written answers to these:
Cognition's docs list usage policies with per-user limits and a trust center, so some of this may already be answered. Read those first, then ask for the gaps. See enterprise AI coding agent security for a longer checklist and build vs buy AI agents for the wider choice.
Cloud agents are easy to love in a demo and hard to price in practice. Track four numbers for a month.
Number | How to get it |
|---|---|
Tasks sent | Count tickets you handed to Devin |
Merge rate | Pull requests merged with little or no change, divided by tasks sent |
Review time | Minutes you spent reading and fixing each pull request |
Cost per merged PR | Plan fee plus any on-demand usage, divided by merged PRs |
If review time per pull request is longer than the time you would have spent doing the task, the agent is not saving you anything yet. Tighten the tickets, pick more verifiable tasks, or send fewer. A good result is a high merge rate on small, well-tested tickets.
Keep one habit through all of this: read the pull request as if a stranger wrote it. Check that tests were added, that unrelated files were not touched, and that no secrets or debug output slipped in. A cloud agent is fast, and fast work needs a reviewer who is not rushed.
This is an editorial reading of vendor documentation, not a hands-on test.
Devin helped define the cloud-agent category, and the market has since caught up: Cursor, Copilot, Claude Code and Codex all run work in the cloud. What remains distinctive is the ticket-and-chat entry (Slack, Teams, Jira) and the tie to a desktop IDE and CLI under one quota. What to weigh is not whether it can do the work, but the data default, the review load and the unpublished quotas.
If you try it, start with five ticket-sized tasks that have tests, on a non-sensitive repository, with opt-out set if you pay. Measure how many pull requests merge with little change. That number, not the demo, is the price-performance figure.
Windsurf now redirects to Devin: windsurf.com lands on devin.ai and the docs on docs.devin.ai/desktop, and the product is called Devin Desktop, with Devin Local as its agent.
Free tier + paid
OpenHands is an MIT-licensed project that now centres on Agent Canvas, a self-hosted control centre where you start conversations and automations with the OpenHands agent or with other agents such as Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, Pi and OpenCode.
Free tier + paid · 92,286 stars
Amp, from Sourcegraph, runs each coding agent on its own remote machine, called an Orb, and works from the web, apps and a CLI.
Free tier + paid
Claude Code is Anthropic's coding agent for the terminal, VS Code, JetBrains, a desktop app and the web.
Subscription · 153,977 stars
Cursor is a desktop AI editor with a terminal CLI and cloud agents that work in their own virtual machines.
Free tier + paid
GitHub Copilot is GitHub's assistant for editors, the terminal and github.com, with an agent mode, a CLI and a cloud agent.
Free tier + paid
Checked 2026-10-31
Checked 2026-10-31
Checked 2026-10-31
Devin is Cognition's autonomous AI software engineer. It works in a cloud environment with its own IDE, shell and browser, takes tasks from the web app, Slack, Teams, Linear or Jira, and returns pull requests.
Free is $0, Pro is $20 a month, Max is $200 a month, and Teams is $80 a month plus $40 per full dev seat. Enterprise is custom. The pages we read do not publish quota sizes.
Cognition's security page says it may use your data for model training by default, with an opt-out on paid plans. Enterprise customers are not trained on without written consent.
The docs recommend clear prompts with completion criteria and tasks that are easy to verify, such as migrations, refactors, bug fixes, test writing and tickets. Their rule of thumb: if it takes you about three hours, Devin can likely do it.
Loading poll...
Loading reviews…
Only members can review this page. Sign in
The all-in-one WordPress community stack
Also ours: wbcomdesigns.comvapvarun.combrndle.com