LLM API Prices Compared: Claude, GPT, Gemini, DeepSeek
Checked 2026-10-31
Model / inference API
Inference provider headquartered in US. Serves models through OpenRouter as "Together".
Checked 2026-10-31
Loading poll...
Together AI hosts a wide catalogue of open-weight models behind one OpenAI-style API, billed per token, and sells dedicated GPUs and fine-tuning too. On 2026-10-31 gpt-oss-120B costs $0.15 in and $0.60 out per million tokens, and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash costs $0.30 and $1.20. Its policy says it will not train on your data without opt-in.
Item | What Together states | Source |
|---|---|---|
What it is | Inference and training platform for open models | Docs and pricing |
Serverless price list | Per million tokens, with cached and batch prices on many models | Pricing page |
Cheapest big-model examples | gpt-oss-120B $0.15 / $0.60; GLM-5.3-Flash $0.15 / $0.50 | Pricing page |
Training on your data | Not without explicit opt-in and consent | Privacy policy |
Serverless limits | Best-effort; 429 and 503 at high demand | Rate limits docs |
Guaranteed capacity | Provisioned throughput with an SLA, via sales | Rate limits docs |
Other products | Dedicated inference, GPU clusters, sandboxes, fine-tuning | Pricing page |
Prices checked 2026-10-31. Together does not make the models. It serves other labs' open weights, which makes it the host to look at when you want an open model with data terms that are not the maker's.
The serverless table lists many models. These are representative rows, per million tokens, with the cached input price where the page shows one.
Model | Input | Cached input | Output |
|---|---|---|---|
Kimi K3 | $3.00 | $0.30 | $15.00 |
Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B | $2.00 | $0.25 | $6.00 |
GLM-5.3 | $1.40 | $0.26 | $4.40 |
GLM-5.3-Flash | $0.15 | $0.03 | $0.50 |
Muse Spark Open | $1.25 | $0.15 | $4.25 |
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 | $1.32 | $0.13 | $3.96 |
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 | $0.30 | $0.006 | $1.20 |
MiniMax M3.1 Flash | $0.15 | $0.015 | $0.60 |
gpt-oss-120B | $0.15 | not listed | $0.60 |
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B | $0.60 | $0.35 | $3.60 |
Together also lists small and experimental entries, for example a 4B model at $0.04 and one free listing, and a long tail of older models. The page notes that displayed prices refer to the lowest resolution or duration setting for image, audio and video models, so those rows move with settings. The table also carries a Batch API price column.
Compare Together's DeepSeek rows against DeepSeek's own. V4.1 Flash costs $0.30 and $1.20 here, which matches DeepSeek's peak-hour price and is double DeepSeek's off-peak $0.15 and $0.60. V4 Pro 0813 at $1.32 and $3.96 also matches DeepSeek's peak price. You pay that premium for a US company's terms in place of those of DeepSeek, and for no peak and off-peak schedule to manage. Check the cached rate too: $0.006 for Flash is the same as DeepSeek's peak cache-hit rate.
For the labs behind these models see Qwen models, GLM models, Kimi models and open source LLM.
Together's rate-limits page makes an unusual statement for a vendor: in most cases you can use serverless inference without encountering rate limits, and limiting happens with high request volumes or large bursts. It lists no per-tier request tables. Instead it explains how it protects performance.
Read the third bullet as the real position. Serverless on Together is the cheap lane, and a production service with a latency promise belongs on provisioned or dedicated capacity. We did not find published prices for provisioned throughput.
The privacy policy states: "Data that we collect, including your Personal Data, will not be used to train the Company's models without your explicit opt-in and consent." That is a clear default for training, and it is stronger than the opt-out posture of several vendors.
What we could not confirm is how long prompts and completions are kept. The policy describes the company's collection practices for the website, the programmatic APIs and professional support. We did not find a statement of API prompt retention in days on the pages we read. Ask for this in writing if your data is sensitive.
Two background points matter. First, Together serves open weights, so the model maker has no access to your prompts through Together. A DeepSeek model on Together is covered by Together's terms, not DeepSeek's. Second, a few models come with their own licences. Check the licence of the weights you choose, particularly for the ones listed under a custom licence name on Hugging Face. See Mistral AI for one example of a licence clause that matters when you resell inference.
The pricing navigation lists the rest of the platform, which matters if your needs grow.
Product | What it is | When to look |
|---|---|---|
Serverless Inference | Per-token API | Starting out, prototypes |
Provisioned Throughput | Reserved capacity with an SLA | Production with latency promises |
Dedicated Inference | Your own endpoint | Steady high volume, custom models |
GPU Clusters | Rented GPUs, with on-demand B200s advertised | Training or self-managed serving |
Sandbox | Isolated environments | Agents that run code |
Fine-Tuning and Post-Training | Custom models | When a prompt cannot do the job |
Together's own advice on the pricing page is that most teams start with serverless and move to dedicated endpoints at scale. For GPU rental from other suppliers, see Runpod, Modal and Lambda Cloud.
The API is OpenAI-style, so any agent with a custom endpoint option can use it. The base URL is https://api.together.ai/v1, and the key goes in the usual bearer header.
curl https://api.together.ai/v1/chat/completions \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $TOGETHER_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"model":"openai/gpt-oss-120b","messages":[{"role":"user","content":"Summarize this diff."}]}'Together lists a "Coding agent setup" page in its docs and a product called Together Link, described on its site as a way to run open models inside the harness you already use. We did not read the setup steps. OpenCode, Cline and Roo-style agents accept an OpenAI-compatible provider with a base URL and key. See OpenCode and Cline.
A broad catalogue is only useful if you can narrow it. A simple order of work keeps the choice short.
Job | Reasonable first try on Together | Why |
|---|---|---|
Classification, extraction | gpt-oss-120B or GLM-5.3-Flash | $0.15 input is the floor for large models |
Coding agent | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, then V4 Pro | Cached input is very cheap for long loops |
Long documents | A 1M-context model such as DeepSeek or GLM | Check the context on the model page first |
Hard reasoning | Kimi K3 or Qwen3.8-2.4T | Highest listed prices, test before committing |
A host serving open weights does not remove the licence. Each model carries its own. DeepSeek V4 is MIT. gpt-oss is Apache-2.0. Others on the list carry custom licence names on Hugging Face, for example GLM-5.3 and Kimi K3, and Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B is listed as a custom licence in our notes. Use the model card, not the host's page, as the source for what you may do with outputs and fine-tuned derivatives. Two clauses decide most disputes: whether you may resell inference to third parties, and whether a derived model inherits a display or attribution rule. Meta's Muse Spark Open licence, for instance, asks that products using it or a derivative show "Built with Muse Spark Open". See Meta Llama API for that licence.
Response | Meaning on Together | What to do |
|---|---|---|
429 | Request rate too high or a hot model is limited | Back off exponentially, spread requests out |
503 | Temporary capacity shortage | Wait briefly, retry with backoff, cap retries to fit your latency budget |
Model not found | Model delisted or id changed | List models from the API and pin the id |
Slow first token | Serverless is best-effort | Move the workload to provisioned throughput |
Together recommends that you limit retries to what your application's latency allows. For a user-facing product that means a fallback model on a second host, not an endless retry loop. A second host also protects you from the model-specific limits that Together says it can apply when a model is in especially high demand.
Moving off is the same in reverse. Since the interface follows the OpenAI shape, a switch to Fireworks AI or Groq is a base URL change plus a model id check.
If you need | Look at |
|---|---|
A stated zero-retention default | |
Faster output on a few models | |
The maker's own price and terms | |
One key for many hosts | |
To run models on your own GPU |
Take a job that reads 10 million tokens and writes 2 million. The arithmetic is ours, from the table above, and uses cache-miss input prices.
Model on Together | Input | Output | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
gpt-oss-120B | $1.50 | $1.20 | $2.70 |
GLM-5.3-Flash | $1.50 | $1.00 | $2.50 |
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 | $3.00 | $2.40 | $5.40 |
GLM-5.3 | $14.00 | $8.80 | $22.80 |
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 | $13.20 | $7.92 | $21.12 |
Kimi K3 | $30.00 | $30.00 | $60.00 |
The spread from the cheapest to the dearest row is more than twenty to one. As with any host, the saving comes from choosing the smallest model that passes your test. If a long prefix repeats, the cached price matters more than the headline: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash at a $0.006 cached rate turns a repeating 8 million token prefix into about five cents of input.
You are | Pick | Watch for |
|---|---|---|
A builder who wants many open models on one key | Serverless | Best-effort performance |
A company that wants open weights under US terms | Together, with a retention statement in writing | Retention period not on the pages we read |
A team with a steady load | Provisioned or dedicated | Prices are by sales |
A team planning to fine-tune | Fine-tuning and post-training | Training data handling terms |
Together is the broad shelf: more open models than most hosts, a clear non-training default, and a path from per-token to dedicated capacity. The honest costs are best-effort serverless performance, a retention period we could not find on the pages we read, and DeepSeek rows priced at the maker's peak rate. For a team that wants to try several open models, then settle on one under a US company's terms, it is a sensible first host. For one that needs a stated zero-retention promise today, Fireworks AI states it more plainly.
We have not run tests for this page. It reflects Together's published pages on 2026-10-31. Together does not pay for placement here.
Open source LLM, LLM API prices, AI hosting, Fireworks AI, OpenRouter alternatives.
Checked 2026-10-31
Checked 2026-10-31
Checked 2026-10-31
Checked 2026-10-31
Fireworks AI serves open models by the token and states zero data retention by default.
GroqCloud serves open models on its own inference hardware, with speed as the draw.
OpenRouter routes more than 600 models through one API key.
The DeepSeek API bills per token.
Mistral AI's API prices Large 4 at $0.70 per million input tokens and $2.10 output with a 1M context, on our 31 October 2026 read.
Its privacy policy says data it collects will not be used to train the company's models without your explicit opt-in and consent.
$0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens on the serverless price list, the same as Groq lists.
Not on serverless. Together says serverless performance is best-effort and you may see 429 or 503 responses at high demand. Provisioned throughput reserves capacity with a defined SLA through sales.
Dedicated inference, GPU clusters including on-demand B200s, sandboxes, managed storage, fine-tuning and post-training, and a product called Together Link for using open models inside the coding harness you already use.
Loading poll...
Loading reviews…
Only members can review this page. Sign in
Inference provider headquartered in US. Serves models through OpenRouter as "xAI".
Inference provider headquartered in US. Serves models through OpenRouter as "Meta".
Inference provider headquartered in US. Serves models through OpenRouter as "Cohere".
The Gemini API prices per token.
The all-in-one WordPress community stack
Also ours: wbcomdesigns.comvapvarun.combrndle.com